Nexrizen · AI Blueprint

The three to five builds worth funding, ranked by what they return.

We sit with the people who actually run the work and cost every candidate against what it saves. Sometimes the answer is fix the process first and do not build yet — the answer a free audit will never give you.

$5,000 fixed, no change orders 3-5 opportunities, ranked by return $2,500 credited if you build with us
Start a Blueprint Diagnosis and roadmap, no execution · $5,000 fixed

What you walk away with

A map of how the work actually runs today — from the people doing it, not the org chart.
A straight answer on your data — whether it can support what you want, before you spend on it.
Three to five opportunities, ranked by what each returns against what it costs.
An ROI model you can take to your board — and to any team, not just us.
A 30/60/90 plan naming what to do first, second, and not yet.

Yours to keep and use with any vendor. $2,500 comes back if you build the first one with us.

"Gabriel has been an incredible asset. He is a skilled engineer with a strategic, entrepreneurial mindset. As a founder himself, he understands how to align tech with business goals. Having his level of talent on a fractional basis has been an absolute game changer for us."
Helaine Knapp
Helaine Knapp
Founder & CEO, CITYROW (acquired by WaterRower)
"His exceptional ability to lead development teams and direct technological innovation projects has transformed our platform. His approach to integrating cutting-edge solutions has been fundamental in improving operational efficiency."
Josue Roman
Josue Roman
COO, ABACROP
"His talent as a remarkable software developer enabled us to take our platform to a level that would take most dev shops months to complete. Gabriel Perez is a true hidden gem!"
Kevin Malley
Kevin Malley
CEO, GyftGram (Techstars '24)

You Know Something's Broken. You Just Don't Know What to Build.

"I know we need technology, but I have no idea where to start"

That's exactly where we come in. We listen to how your business actually works, find the bottlenecks, and translate them into a clear technical plan — in plain English.

"Every vendor pitches their solution before understanding our problem"

We don't sell tools. We diagnose problems. Our recommendations come from understanding your business, not from a product catalog.

"I'm terrified of spending $100K and ending up with the wrong thing"

That is what the $5,000 buys: a ranked list with the numbers underneath it, before anyone quotes you six figures. Most candidates do not survive the ranking — which is exactly where the $100K stops being at risk.

"We tried building something before and it didn't work"

Usually that means the problem wasn't diagnosed properly. We start from scratch — your pain points, not someone else's assumptions about what you need.

You do not need to arrive with the answer. You need to leave with it — ranked, priced, and in writing.

What this engagement will not do

You are paying for the diagnosis. That is what makes each of these possible.

Rank an opportunity higher because it happens to be work we would enjoy building
Recommend technology based on hype instead of fit
Score anything your data cannot actually support yet
Pad the list — if only two things are worth doing, you get two
No code is written in a Blueprint. Every finding is documented so the plan can be handed to any team, including one that is not us.

What lands at the end

Five things, and none of them is a slide deck.

Deliverable 01

A map of how the work actually gets done

Not the org chart, and not the process document nobody follows. Where the work really flows, where it stalls, and who is holding it together manually.

Deliverable 02

An honest read on whether your data is ready

Most automation projects die here, quietly, three months in. We check first: what you actually capture, where it lives, and what would have to be true before anything can be built on top of it.

Deliverable 03

Three to five opportunities, ranked by return

Every candidate scored on what it saves against what it costs to build. Ranked, so the argument becomes which one to start with rather than whether to start.

Deliverable 04

The numbers behind the ranking

Hours, error rates, and cost per transaction as they stand today, and what each changes to. You can check our working, and you can take it to a CFO.

Deliverable 05

A 30/60/90 plan you can start on Monday

What to do first, what waits, and what has to be true before the next thing starts. Written so any competent team can pick it up.

How the weeks run

Two to four weeks. About six hours of your time.

The length depends on how many people touch the work. Nothing to prepare — we pull the process out of your team's heads on the calls.

The days you are involved Kickoff to handover
  1. Week 1

    Sessions with the people doing the work You are in this

    Not just the leadership view. We talk to whoever actually runs the process, because the bottleneck is almost never where the org chart says it is.

  2. Week 1-2

    Data readiness check

    We look at what you capture and where it lives. This is the step that decides whether the rest is feasible, so it happens before anything is promised.

  3. Week 2-3

    Scoring and ranking

    Each opportunity costed against what it returns. You get a mid-point look so nothing lands as a surprise.

  4. Final week

    Handover You are in this

    The ranked list, the ROI model, and the 30/60/90 plan, walked live and then sent.

The terms

$5,000

Fixed. Two to four weeks. No change orders, no hourly overage.

  • You keep everything, whatever you decide. The map, the ranked opportunities, the ROI model, and the plan. If we are not the right team to build it, you can hand the whole package to anyone.

  • $2,500 comes off your first invoice if you go ahead with us within 90 days — on a build, or on a Discovery Sprint to specify one of the opportunities properly.

  • Guarantee"Don't build anything yet" is a legitimate outcome. Sometimes the honest finding is that a process needs fixing before anything is automated, and that the build money should wait. Being paid for the diagnosis is what lets us say so. A free assessment never ends that way.

  • Diagnosis and roadmap. No execution. This engagement does not write code. If you already know what to build and need it specified and priced, the [Discovery Sprint](/discovery-sprint/) is the one you want.

Why this is not a free consultation.

An agency that gives the assessment away only gets paid if you build something. So the assessment always concludes that you should build something. Everyone involved knows this, which is why nobody trusts a free audit.

Being paid for the diagnosis is what lets us tell you the answer is to fix a process, hire someone, buy something off the shelf, or wait six months. You get that answer in a few weeks rather than finding it out a hundred thousand dollars into a build.

Three ways to start. Each one ends with something you keep.

You do not need to know which service you want. Find the situation you are actually in — then check you are not ruled out underneath it.

Proof of Concept

Find out whether it works before you fund it.

This is you ifYou know what you want built, and you want to watch a real piece of it run before you commit the budget.

  • A working feature in your repo, live on your data, inside a week.
  • A real answer to “can this actually work here” for $2,500, instead of a six-figure guess.
  • The code, whether or not you take it any further with us.
Price
$2,500
Time
7 days
Credited to your build
$1,250 back if you build within 90 days

Not you if

  • Nobody internally agrees on what to build yet. AI Blueprint →
  • The build behind this is already six figures and unspecified — one working feature will not de-risk it. Discovery Sprint →
See the Proof of Concept

AI Blueprint

Spend the budget on the thing that pays it back.

This is you ifSomething is clearly costing you time or money, and nobody can tell you which fix is worth making first.

  • Three to five opportunities ranked by what each returns, with the arithmetic behind the ranking.
  • An ROI model you can defend to your board, and use with any team — not only ours.
  • Permission to not build: when the answer is fix the process first, we say so.
Price
$5,000
Time
2-4 weeks
Credited to your build
$2,500 back if you go ahead within 90 days

Not you if

  • You already know which single process to fix and only need it specified and priced. Discovery Sprint →
  • There is only one candidate on the table — ranking five of them is not worth $5,000.
See the AI Blueprint

Discovery Sprint

Know the real number before you sign for it.

This is you ifYou know the problem, and you are about to commit six figures to an estimate nobody has actually checked.

  • A clickable spec of the thing itself, so the argument about scope happens now and not in month three.
  • A price written by the engineer who would build it — at three budget levels, not one number.
  • The whole package to take to any firm, including one that is not us.
Price
$8,000
Time
2 weeks
Credited to your build
$4,000 back if you build within 90 days

Not you if

  • You only want to see one idea work first. Proof of Concept →
  • The build behind it is under roughly $55,000 — this is hard to justify. Email us, there is a smaller version that fits.
See the Discovery Sprint

Find out what is worth building, before you build it.

$5,000 fixed. $2,500 back if you go ahead with us. The plan is yours either way.

Start a Blueprint

You keep every deliverable, even if you never hire us